Well, he can't fault the logic, honestly. Get 'em girl.
There's a hum at her response and he considers how to respond. Slowly, he turns and looks back in the direction of the casino.
"Correct." Another pause, because he's real bad at conversation like dude failing grades here. He makes Cloud look like a social butterfly. It's embarrassing. "I assessed a few things. Physically, there are a few ways to break into the casino, and various acceptable escape routes. Fairly easy to infiltrate but I imagine security is not their top priority at the moment. As for my insight on Aldrip and the situation..."
This guy cannot stop pausing. Ellipses are just his dialogue. Help.
"I'm still attempting to determine the purpose of their crime and punishment system and who it benefits. From overhearing various citizens, it appears those not native to this city are the ones affected primarily. Perhaps as outsiders, that is why the natives also find us as a threat." It also doesn't help that Vincent skulks around like a knockoff Nosferatu. "I am not opposed to people being held accountable for their actions. However, it is arbitrary at best. Deceptive at worst."
Fortunately for Vincent, Toph is a lot more patient than she looks. Especially when she can tell someone's actually thinking about their words and isn't just making her wait for dramatic effect. There's no appearance of wanting him to hurry up as she listens.
Social graces are way overrated in her book.
Toph accepts the comments about the casino itself with a slight smirk, making a mental note to consider hiring him on to help fix the place up after she buys it out. She's already imagining herself as head of security. If she's going to be investor and co-owner, why not give herself the best job? In any case, since he's taking the question seriously, she'll do him the favor of giving him her serious, considered answer.
"I can't tell how serious they are about it, honestly. At first I thought it was gonna be this whole legal political thing where there's somebody deciding what's a crime and what's not, but I don't think that's it. It's not like there's rules posted anywhere. And I haven't seen them punish anybody for something that isn't, like, obviously bad. Hard to argue with them sentencing someone who was threatening to kill a bunch of innocent bystanders."
like she would listen to her real dad anyway
There's a hum at her response and he considers how to respond. Slowly, he turns and looks back in the direction of the casino.
"Correct." Another pause, because he's real bad at conversation like dude failing grades here. He makes Cloud look like a social butterfly. It's embarrassing. "I assessed a few things. Physically, there are a few ways to break into the casino, and various acceptable escape routes. Fairly easy to infiltrate but I imagine security is not their top priority at the moment. As for my insight on Aldrip and the situation..."
This guy cannot stop pausing. Ellipses are just his dialogue. Help.
"I'm still attempting to determine the purpose of their crime and punishment system and who it benefits. From overhearing various citizens, it appears those not native to this city are the ones affected primarily. Perhaps as outsiders, that is why the natives also find us as a threat." It also doesn't help that Vincent skulks around like a knockoff Nosferatu. "I am not opposed to people being held accountable for their actions. However, it is arbitrary at best. Deceptive at worst."
so why should she listen to a FAKE dad !!!
Social graces are way overrated in her book.
Toph accepts the comments about the casino itself with a slight smirk, making a mental note to consider hiring him on to help fix the place up after she buys it out. She's already imagining herself as head of security. If she's going to be investor and co-owner, why not give herself the best job? In any case, since he's taking the question seriously, she'll do him the favor of giving him her serious, considered answer.
"I can't tell how serious they are about it, honestly. At first I thought it was gonna be this whole legal political thing where there's somebody deciding what's a crime and what's not, but I don't think that's it. It's not like there's rules posted anywhere. And I haven't seen them punish anybody for something that isn't, like, obviously bad. Hard to argue with them sentencing someone who was threatening to kill a bunch of innocent bystanders."